Michigan Lake Depths All Michigan lakes
NESW

Finger Lake

Gogebic County, Michigan · MI DNR bathymetric survey
30ft Max
depth
63 acres 3 contours
Paddling Index83Very GoodMedium confidenceaway from major roads · wooded shoreline · sheltered geometry
Get directions

Depth scale

The lake

Survey readout

Finger Lake is mapped to a depth of 30 ft on the Michigan DNR survey and covers about 63 acres in Gogebic County, Michigan.

Measured from the Michigan DNR inland-lake contour survey.

Deepest mapped contour
30 ft
Mean depth
16 ft · estimated
Surface area
63 acres
Estimated volume
1,004 acre-ft · 327M gal
Shoreline
1.53 mi · lobed
Aquatic vegetation
5% of surface · NDVI estimate
Public access
No public DNR launch identified
Additional depth details3 contours
Contour depths
0–30 ft
Recorded point soundings
30 ft

29% of the surface sits over water shallower than 10 ft; 44.2% is deeper than 20 ft. Depth, area and volume are estimated from the interpolated survey surface — historical reference, not measurement.

Compare with another lake
Chart data

Provenance

Sources: MI DNR inland lake contours, USGS 3DEP, USDA NAIP (public domain), OpenStreetMap (ODbL), MI DNR Boat Launches.

⚠ Not for navigation

Spot an error? Send a correction

Map details & sources5 sources

All layers registered to one bounding box; positions in WGS 84.

Survey-derived depth contours drape over USGS 3DEP elevation, with a USDA NAIP aerial basemap and OpenStreetMap shoreline. Colour shows surveyed depth; dark lines are the survey's own isobaths.

Coordinates
46.11917, -89.00307
MI DNR lake ID
L43941
Vertical exaggeration
2.66×
Basemap
USDA NAIP · public domain
Model size
2.5 MB

Paddling

Paddling Index methodology v1.0 · calculated 2026-08-21
83 / 100Very GoodData confidence: Medium

Finger Lake has a heavily wooded and largely undeveloped setting, generally sheltered geometry, little nearby major-road exposure. No special watercraft restriction is identified in the current source.

Why this score?5 components

Included in the index

ComponentRatingPoints of weightMeasurement
Natural settingExcellent32.6 of 3593% natural land cover within 150 m of shore (79% forest, 12% wetland; 5% developed)
Geometric wind exposureVery Good24.6 of 29mean fetch 622 m · 18% of sampled water within 500 m of shelter · generally short fetch
Watercraft controlsNone identified8.8 of 18No special watercraft restriction identified in the current DNR source. Motors permitted, subject to general law.
Public accessNot listedNo DNR-listed access site. Township, county and road-end launches are not in this source, so this is not evidence that access is poor — the component is excluded and the remaining weights are renormalized.
Road isolationExcellent17.2 of 18relatively isolated from major roads · 5 MDOT-classified segments within 1.2 km, peak 117 vehicles/day

Additional paddling considerations

These describe the lake but are not part of the v1 Paddling Index and do not change the number above.

Wake sensitivity
Low — wide enough that wakes disperse over most of the lake
Aquatic vegetation
Low — approximately 5% mapped coverage · NAIP aerial imagery (NDVI)
Observed motorized activity
Unknown — No lake-level measurement of boat traffic is available. Legal permission to operate motors is not evidence of use.
Wildlife habitat potential
High — 79% forest and 12% wetland cover within 150 m of shore
How this index is calculated. The Paddling Index is a relative composite derived from lake geometry and public environmental, access, roadway and watercraft-control data. It is not a user review, a safety rating, or a prediction of an individual outing. Differences of a few points should not be treated as meaningful — an 84 and an 82 are broadly comparable. Components and weights: natural setting 30%, geometric wind exposure 25%, watercraft controls 15%, public access 15%, road isolation 15%; observed motorboat activity is weighted 0% because no defensible lake-level measurement exists. Where a component has no data the remaining weights are renormalized and the confidence rating is lowered; below Medium confidence no number is shown. Sources: MI DNR Watercraft Control Areas (2026-08), USGS/MRLC NLCD Land Cover (2021), MDOT Annual Average Daily Traffic (2025) and MI DNR bathymetric survey outline (0 ft isobath). Conditions change quickly — check current weather and local conditions before going out.

Fish you might catch

from active stocking

No recent catch, survey, or stocking data for this lake.

Historically stocked, no recent evidence: Splake (last planted 2008), Brook Trout (last planted 2008), Brown Trout (last planted 1980) — not shown above.

Compiled from Michigan DNR stockings within the last 10 years. Silhouettes are stylized and scaled to typical adult sizes relative to one another. Presence is not a promise — fishing isn’t a sure thing.

DNR stocking

state stocking record · 1980–2008

Fish the Michigan DNR has planted in this lake — what was added, distinct from what a survey netted above.

Splake106,861 stocked · 1981–2008 · 26 plantings
Brook trout2,559 stocked · 1980–2008 · 2 plantings
Brown trout7,200 stocked · 1980

No stockings recorded since 2008 — shown as history.

Non-native species records

No non-native species recorded in the available dataset. This does not confirm that no non-native species are present.

Source: Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership Conservation Planner; underlying nonindigenous species records from the USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species database.

Quick answers

Finger Lake — common questions

How deep is Finger Lake?

The deepest contour on the Michigan DNR bathymetric survey of Finger Lake is 30 ft. That is the deepest depth the historical survey map records, which may differ from the deepest point of the lake itself.

How big is Finger Lake?

Finger Lake covers about 63 acres in Gogebic County, Michigan.

What is the average depth of Finger Lake?

The estimated mean depth of Finger Lake is 16 ft, calculated from the survey contours.

Is there public access to Finger Lake?

No public launch for Finger Lake appears in the Michigan DNR access data. That is not the same as the lake being private -- municipal and private ramps are not in that source.